Wolverhampton Wanderers vs Bournemouth statistics 31.01.2026
-
31/01/26
10:00
|
Round 24
-
- 0 : 2
- Finished
Match
1st Half
2nd Half
1.38
Expected goals (xG)
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
1.36
51
%
Ball possession
49
%
4
Big chances
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
2
17
Total shots
9
7
Shots on goal
4
7
Shots off goal
4
7
Shots inside the Box
7
10
Shots outside the Box
2
1.4
xG on target (xGOT)
xG on target (xGOT) - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution - shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. - after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team's total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
xG on target (xGOT) - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution - shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. - after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team's total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
1.46
3
Blocked shots
1
1
Hit the woodwork
0
26
Touches in the opposition Box
15
2
Offsides
2
15
Free kicks
11
5
Corner kicks
6
16
Throw ins
13
389/476 (82%)
Passes
397/469 (85%)
19/45 (42%)
Long Passes
24/53 (45%)
73/104 (70%)
Passes in final third
63/99 (64%)
7/22 (32%)
Crosses
3/11 (27%)
1
Expected assists (xA)
Expected assists (xA) - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver's position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player's or team's total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Expected assists (xA) - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver's position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player's or team's total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
1.03
11
Fouls
15
2
Yellow cards
3
60
Duels won
56
17/23 (74%)
Tackles
11/20 (55%)
19
Clearances
32
3
Interceptions
13
0
Errors leading to shot
1
2
Goalkeeper saves
7
1.46
xGOT faced
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot's quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team's total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot's quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team's total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
1.4
-0.54
Goals prevented
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
1.4
10
Matches
2 - Wins
3 - Draws
5 - Losses
10
Matches
Wins - 2
Draws - 6
Losses - 2
Goal Difference
-1
14
15
scored
conceded
-2
20
22
- 1.4
- Goals scored per match
- 2
- 1.5
- Goals conceded per match
- 2.2
- 31'
- Minutes/Goal scored
- 22.1'
- 2.9
- Match goals average
- 4.2
- 29
- Goals
- 42
Wolverhampton Wanderers are struggling hard this season. They won just one match from 23, drew five, and lost a whopping 17. That's tough for the team. Bournemouth, full of fight, grabbed seven wins and nine draws in their 23 games. They scored 38 goals compared to Wolves' mere 15, showing Bournemouth's sharper attack.
Both teams conceded 43 goals, highlighting weak defenses. Bournemouth's matches average 3.52 goals, making them thrilling affairs. Wolves' games sit at 2.52 goals, often dull. Fans see Bournemouth as the vibrant side, while Wolves fight to turn things around. This contrast shows clear differences in team spirit.
