USL Dunkerque vs En Avant de Guingamp statistics 06.02.2026
-
06/02/26
14:00
|
Round 22
-
- 0 : 0
- Finished
Match
1st Half
2nd Half
1.2
Expected goals (xG)
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
Expected goals xG - measures the quality of a scoring chance and the probability of it becoming a goal. It's calculated from factors like shot location, angle, distance, assist type, and defensive pressure. Each shot gets a value from 0 to 1; a team's total xG is the sum of all its shots. A penalty is usually worth ~0.79–0.80. Higher xG = better chances, regardless of whether goals were actually scored.
1.49
57
%
Ball possession
43
%
1
Big chances
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
Big chances - counts clear scoring opportunities where a goal is highly expected. These are situations like one-on-one with the goalkeeper, close-range shots with little defensive pressure, or shots into an open goal.
0
14
Total shots
17
2
Shots on goal
5
6
Shots off goal
9
8
Shots inside the Box
9
6
Shots outside the Box
8
0.8
xG on target (xGOT)
xG on target (xGOT) - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution - shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. - after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team's total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
xG on target (xGOT) - measures the likelihood that a shot on target results in a goal. Unlike xG (which evaluates the chance before the shot), xGOT assesses execution - shot placement, goalkeeper position, etc. - after the ball is struck. Only shots on target are included, each valued 0–1. A team's total xGOT is the sum of all its on-target shots.
0.75
6
Blocked shots
3
1
Hit the woodwork
0
17
Touches in the opposition Box
20
0
Offsides
2
10
Free kicks
12
5
Corner kicks
4
10
Throw ins
11
459/512 (90%)
Passes
335/396 (85%)
20/43 (47%)
Long Passes
24/47 (51%)
97/124 (78%)
Passes in final third
72/102 (71%)
6/24 (25%)
Crosses
4/14 (29%)
1.48
Expected assists (xA)
Expected assists (xA) - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver's position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player's or team's total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
Expected assists (xA) - measures the likelihood that a completed pass will become an assist for a goal. It evaluates the quality of the pass based on factors like its placement, trajectory, speed, the receiver's position, defensive pressure, and the overall attacking context. Each key pass receives a value between 0 and 1; a player's or team's total xA is the sum of these values. Higher xA indicates better chance creation, even if the subsequent shot is missed or saved.
1.24
12
Fouls
10
1
Yellow cards
2
1
Red cards
0
30
Duels won
27
7/11 (64%)
Tackles
5/7 (71%)
23
Clearances
26
2
Interceptions
7
1
Errors leading to shot
0
5
Goalkeeper saves
2
0.75
xGOT faced
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot's quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team's total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
xGOT faced - total number of goals a goalkeeper would be expected to concede based on the volume and quality of on-target shots faced. Each shot's quality is assessed using post-shot factors: placement, goalkeeper positioning, shot speed, etc. xGOT Faced for a team equals the opposing team's total xGOT from shots on target. It serves as the benchmark for calculating Goals Prevented.
0.8
0.75
Goals prevented
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
Goals prevented - measures how many goals a goalkeeper saved compared to expectation. It is calculated as the difference between xGOT Faced (the total post-shot expected goals of all on-target shots faced) and the actual number of goals conceded (excluding own goals). A higher positive value indicates the goalkeeper performed above average, preventing more goals than expected from the quality of shots faced. A negative value means more goals were conceded than the shots "deserved.
0.8
10
Matches
5 - Wins
2 - Draws
3 - Losses
10
Matches
Wins - 6
Draws - 0
Losses - 4
Goal Difference
+8
18
10
scored
conceded
+6
17
11
- 1.8
- Goals scored per match
- 1.7
- 1
- Goals conceded per match
- 1.1
- 33.2'
- Minutes/Goal scored
- 32.1'
- 2.8
- Match goals average
- 2.8
- 28
- Goals
- 28
USL Dunkerque and En Avant de Guingamp both played 21 matches, each grabbing 9 wins. Dunkerque shines with 6 draws and only 6 losses, showing a tougher defense. They scored 35 goals and let in just 23, making their games feel tight and controlled. Guingamp fights hard too, with 5 draws and 7 losses, but their matches explode with more goals, scoring 33 and conceding 33 for exciting plays.
Comparing attacks, Dunkerque edges ahead with 1.67 goals per match versus Guingamp's 1.57. Yet Guingamp's defense leaks, allowing the same 1.57 goals per game, leading to busier matches at 3.14 goals average. Dunkerque keeps it steady at 2.76, proving they are the resilient warriors on the field, while Guingamp brings the thrill of high-stakes battles.
